Contact Hours: 2
This educational activity is credited for 2 contact hours at completion of the activity.
Course Purpose
To provide an overview of The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and its regulation, and to equip healthcare providers with the knowledge necessary to navigate compliance and protect patient information effectively.
Overview
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federal ruling legislated by President Bill Clinton on August 21, 1996, to protect patient information within the healthcare system. The legislation was driven by the increased use of technology in healthcare and the emergence of electronic health records. This course aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of HIPAA and its regulation.This course also aims to equip healthcare providers with the knowledge necessary to navigate compliance and protect patient information effectively.
Course Objectives
Upon completion of this course, the learner will be able to:
- Describe the federal ruling on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the legislated titles that create a framework that protects patient information, promotes efficient data exchange, and improves access to healthcare coverage.
- Describe the Privacy Rule and its influence on protected health information (PHI).
- Identify protected entities under HIPPA
- Understand when information can be disclosed without consent
- Describe steps that should be taken if unauthorized disclosure of private health information occurs, and penalties that may be imposed.
Policy Statement
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the policies of FastCEForLess.com.
Disclosures
Fast CE For Less, Inc and its authors have no disclosures. There is no commercial support.
To access Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
To access Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
Definitions
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a federal ruling legislated by President Bill Clinton on August 21, 1996, to protect patient information within the healthcare system.1 The legislation was driven by the increased use of technology in healthcare and the emergence of electronic health records. These changes raised concerns about the potential for unauthorized access and data breaches of sensitive patient data, which could be misused. Beyond enhancing security, there was also a growing need to increase the portability of health information electronically across various healthcare entities without compromising security. To address these aspects of healthcare privacy and administrative efficiency, HIPAA introduced five distinct titles.
- Title I safeguards health insurance access for employees and their families when they change or lose jobs.
- Title II, known for its Administrative Simplification (AS) provisions, establishes national standards for electronic healthcare transactions, including unique identifiers for healthcare providers, insurers, and employers.
- Title III sets requirements for pre-tax medical savings accounts.
- Title IV outlines guidelines for group health plans.
- Title V regulates company-owned life insurance policies.
Together, these titles create a framework that protects patient information, promotes efficient data exchange, and improves access to healthcare coverage. Over the years, this piece of legislation has undergone several amendments to maintain alignment with evolving healthcare and data protection needs. This includes the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule – both under Title II. Through its Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) implements and enforces HIPAA regulations. This course aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of HIPAA and its regulation.2 This course also aims to equip healthcare providers with the knowledge necessary to navigate compliance and protect patient information effectively.
The Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information in HIPAA, or Privacy Rule, sets national standards for the disclosure and use of patient health information, also called Protected Health Information (PHI), along with electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI), by covered entities.3 First published in 2000, then modified and published again in 2002, these regulations aim to uphold patients’ rights to privacy while maintaining an efficient healthcare system, ensuring that patients’ privacy rights are upheld without hindering necessary healthcare operations. There are several key provisions in the Privacy Rule. One provision that is used to promote transparency in patient data handling is the Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP). The notice, required under the Privacy Rule, informs patients about their rights and explains how their health information may be used or disclosed. The Privacy Rule also grants individuals several rights regarding their health information. Patients can request access to their PHI, allowing them to view and obtain copies of their health records. They can also request amendments if they believe the information is inaccurate or incomplete. This aspect of the rule emphasizes a patient’s role in overseeing their medical history and ensuring its accuracy, fostering trust between patients and providers.
Through the Privacy Rule, patients can also request limitations on certain uses or disclosures of their PHI, although providers are not obligated to agree to all requested restrictions. Another critical aspect of the Privacy Rule is its guidance on PHI disclosure.3 The rule limits the use of PHI to only what is necessary to accomplish the purpose of a given task. This is known as the “minimum necessary” standard. Thus, when PHI is disclosed, entities must share the least amount of information needed to complete a particular function, whether for billing purposes, research, or compliance. This measure is intended to mitigate risks associated with unnecessary sharing of sensitive data.
The Privacy Rule also restricts certain disclosures without patient consent. To enforce these standards, covered entities must implement both physical and administrative safeguards to protect PHI. This includes secure data storage, controlled access to information, and regular training for staff on privacy practices. In case of a breach or improper disclosure of PHI, entities are required to notify affected individuals promptly and may face penalties or corrective actions.
Under HIPAA, “covered entities” are the organizations and individuals required to comply with the act’s regulations.4 These include healthcare providers, health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and any other entity that manages sensitive health information, such as an entity’s business associates. Healthcare providers are professionals or organizations that deliver medical or health services. This includes doctors, nurses, dentists, clinics, hospitals, nursing homes, and pharmacies. Regardless of specialty or size, a provider is a covered entity if they transmit health data as part of transactions like claims processing, eligibility inquiries, or referral requests. HIPAA mandates that providers implement privacy practices to protect PHI while ensuring it can be accessed for necessary uses, such as treatment and billing. Health plans cover a wide range of insurance providers and organizations involved in healthcare financing. Examples of health plans include traditional insurance providers, health maintenance organizations (HMOs), employer-sponsored group plans, Medicare, Medicaid, and even certain long-term care insurers. These organizations regularly access PHI to facilitate insurance-related activities, such as eligibility verification, claims processing, and payment coordination. However, HIPAA exempts some group health plans from certain privacy provisions, acknowledging that smaller plans often have limited PHI access and fewer administrative resources. This includes those with fewer than 50 participants that are self-administered by the employer.
Healthcare clearinghouses are intermediaries that manage the flow of health information between healthcare providers and health plans.4 They receive non-standard data and transform it into standardized formats to ensure data compatibility across systems. Clearinghouses also validate data for accuracy, adding an extra layer of quality control. While they do not typically interact with patients directly, these organizations manage identifiable health information and are thus considered covered entities under HIPAA. Business associates are external parties that provide specialized services to covered entities that require them to access PHI. For instance, billing and coding companies, data storage and cloud services, legal consultants, and IT service providers are all considered business associates. HIPAA mandates that these associates sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with the covered entity, ensuring their accountability for handling PHI responsibly. The BAA outlines obligations, such as notifying the covered entity when a data breach occurs, providing HIPAA-compliant training for their employees, and following robust security routines to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data. HIPAA provides a few specific exceptions in the category. For instance, healthcare clearinghouses that only manage PHI as a business associate of another covered entity do not need to develop a separate Notice of Privacy Practices. Similarly, correctional institutions only manage minimal health information for enrollment and claims eligibility. In addition to the main categories of covered entities, HIPAA provides organizational options for entities with complex structures. For instance, a hybrid entity designation allows organizations to conduct both covered and non-covered functions, such as universities with healthcare services, to limit HIPAA compliance to their health-related components. This reduces the regulatory burden on non-health operations while maintaining necessary protections for PHI. Covered entities linked by common ownership or control, such as a healthcare network, can also form an affiliated covered entity, allowing them to consolidate their privacy practices and streamline compliance under a single Privacy Rule framework. Entities collaborating closely to deliver healthcare services, such as hospitals sharing patient data for coordinated treatment, may form an organized healthcare arrangement (OHCA). This allows covered entities to manage PHI jointly for the benefit of a common enterprise while respecting HIPAA’s privacy standards. For group health plans, HIPAA permits limited PHI disclosures to plan sponsors under strict guidelines, ensuring the information remains used only for plan administration and not for unrelated purposes. These structural options enable diverse healthcare operations to meet HIPAA standards while effectively serving their organizational needs.
Under HIPAA, there are several instances of permitted disclosure where a healthcare entity or covered entity can share PHI, provided they have patients’ consent.5 These include:
- Marketing and communication purposes
- When healthcare providers or related entities wish to use PHI for marketing, explicit patient authorization is necessary. For example, if a healthcare provider intends to promote a particular product or service unrelated to the patient’s current care, they must first get the patient’s written consent. However, in cases where the marketing pertains directly to treatment or benefits relevant to the patient, verbal consent may be acceptable.
- Research studies and clinical trials
- When PHI is needed for clinical research, providers must obtain explicit patient consent before disclosing identifiable information. Patients may provide written authorization that gives researchers permission to use PHI in a manner aligned with ethical standards and federal research guidelines. In certain minimal-risk studies, verbal consent may be appropriate when authorized by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) as long as the patients fully understand the scope of their participation.
- Employment-related situations
- HIPAA also permits patients to authorize disclosure to their employer in cases such as workers’ compensation claims, workplace wellness programs, or assessments for work-related injuries. While written consent is standard, verbal consent may apply in time-sensitive contexts if both patient and provider agree.
- Third-party applications and personal health records
- With the rise of various digital health platforms, patients increasingly choose to share their PHI with third-party apps for tracking or managing their health. HIPAA allows patients to provide either verbal or written consent as long as they are informed of how their data will be used, accessed, and protected.
- Family members and caregivers
- Patients may wish to grant consent to share their PHI with family members or caregivers assisting in their care. This can be done via verbal and written consent, depending on the patient’s preference and the level of disclosure required.
- Legal and financial representatives
- Patients sometimes authorize their legal or financial representatives to access their PHI, enabling these individuals to make financial, medical, or legal decisions on their behalf. In these situations, written authorization is required, especially when the patient is designating a power of attorney to act on their behalf in medical or legal matters. However, verbal consent may suffice for one-time information requests if permitted by the healthcare provider’s policies.
In addition to these instances, HIPAA recognizes the role of personal representatives who are legally authorized to make healthcare decisions on behalf of an individual.2 The Privacy Rule stipulates that covered entities must treat personal representatives similarly to the individuals themselves regarding the use and disclosure of their PHI. This means that a personal representative has the same rights under HIPAA, such as accessing medical records and consenting to the release of information. However, an important exception arises when there is reasonable suspicion that the personal representative may be abusing or neglecting the individual. In such cases, covered entities are required to exercise caution and may withhold PHI to protect the individual’s welfare. Minors present a unique situation within the context of PHI disclosures. Generally, parents function as personal representatives for their minor children and can access their medical records and make decisions on their behalf. However, there are circumstances in which the Privacy Rule defers to state laws regarding parental access to a minor’s health information. For example, when state law restricts parental access or is silent on the issue, covered entities have the decision to allow or deny access based on the professional judgment of licensed healthcare providers. This approach ensures that the rights and best interests of the minor are prioritized while balancing parental authority.
Protected Health Information (PHI) is any health information that can be used to identify an individual and is created, received, stored, or transmitted by covered entities.6 Protected Health Information can be in any form—oral, written, or electronic—and relates to an individual’s past, present, or potential physical or mental health, healthcare services received, or payments for those services. Electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI) refers to PHI that is created, stored, or transmitted electronically, often through EHRs or other digital health systems. It is important to note that while PHI and ePHI contain the same data, there is a significant difference in the medium of information storage and transmission. Thus, both require distinct security approaches. While PHI is protected by stringent privacy regulations, ePHI has additional safeguards to address unique security problems, such as cyber threats and data breaches. HIPAA flags certain types of information as PHI as they can be used to link health information with a specific individual. This includes, but is not limited to:
- Anonymized health data
- Billing information
- Communications
- Device data
- Digital records
- Medical records
- Personal identifiers
Personal identifiers are direct pieces of information, such as a patient’s name, address, phone number, social security number, and birthdate. Medical records encompass detailed health material, including diagnoses, treatment plans, medical history, and test results. Billing information is any financial data related to healthcare, such as payment details, insurance information, claims data, and payment history. Although these records may not always link to a person, they contain identifiable personal information that connects individuals to healthcare services, which, in turn, can be used to identify them. Digital records include any data stored in electronic format, such as electronic health records (EHRs), lab results, prescription histories, and provider notes. Communications refer to any form of correspondence, such as emails, faxes, or messages that contain health-related information about specific patients. Medical devices, like pacemakers or glucose monitors, also generate data that can identify patients, making their data subject to HIPAA regulations. In some instances, even anonymized health data may be considered PHI if reasonable methods exist to re-identify the individual associated with the data.
HIPAA’s Privacy Rule also specifies conditions under which PHI can be disclosed without an individual’s explicit authorization.7 These conditions are known as, treatment, payment, and healthcare operations (TPO). Disclosures related to treatment allow healthcare providers to share information as needed to coordinate patient care, such as communicating between doctors, specialists, or hospitals. Payment disclosures allow for sharing PHI for billing and reimbursement purposes, including communications with insurance companies to determine coverage or to process claims. Healthcare operations encompass activities such as quality assessments, employee training, and administrative procedures, which may be necessary for a healthcare provider to operate efficiently and improve care quality. Certain disclosures are allowed if they are incident to an otherwise permitted use or disclosure, for instance, if a healthcare provider inadvertently overhears a conversation between a patient and their doctor in a shared medical space. HIPAA considers this an incident rather than a violation, provided the facility has taken reasonable steps to ensure privacy. Beyond these specific disclosures, there are twelve situations where HIPAA permits PHI to be disclosed without patient authorization to support critical national priorities and protect public welfare.
- When required by law
- If federal, state, or local laws mandate disclosure, PHI must be shared. This includes cases like reporting specific communicable diseases that impact public health or complying with legal orders.
- Public health activities
- Public health authorities have the right to request PHI without consent to conduct activities related to public health, such as monitoring disease outbreaks, conducting health audits, or implementing interventions to control public health threats. This access is also needed to implement necessary public health measures and track health trends in communities.
- Victims of neglect, abuse, or domestic violence
- If a patient is suspected to be a victim, PHI may be shared with authorized entities such as social services or law enforcement to initiate support or protective actions.
- Health oversight activities
- PHI can be disclosed to agencies overseeing healthcare compliance, such as those conducting audits, inspections, or licensure activities to ensure healthcare standards are met.
- Judicial and administrative proceedings
- Under specific legal conditions such as a court order or in response to a subpoena, provided the PHI is relevant to the case at hand.
- Law enforcement purposes
- Law enforcement agencies can request PHI to aid in criminal investigations, such as locating suspects, victims, or witnesses or investigating crimes occurring within healthcare facilities. Their access to PHI is typically governed by specific legal standards, which may include presenting a warrant or subpoena to ensure that the request is justified.
- Decedents’ information
- PHI can be shared with coroners, medical examiners, and funeral directors to identify deceased individuals, determine the cause of death, or fulfill other official duties.
- Organ and tissue donation
- PHI may be disclosed to organizations involved in organ, eye, or tissue donation to facilitate the transplant process and match donors with recipients.
- Research
- PHI may be disclosed in certain research, provided an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or privacy board approves the project. HIPAA also permits limited disclosures of de-identified information without consent in the form of limited datasets for research, public health, and healthcare operations. These datasets exclude specific identifying information such as names, addresses, and social security numbers but still allow researchers to analyze health trends.
- To Avert serious threats to health or safety
- If there is a serious and imminent threat to an individual or the public, healthcare providers can disclose PHI to prevent harm, such as alerting authorities during a potential epidemic.
- Essential government functions
- PHI disclosures are allowed for specific governmental purposes, such as ensuring national security, providing public benefits, or supporting military operations.
- Workers’ compensation
- PHI may be disclosed when linked to workers’ compensation laws, facilitating claims and benefits for employees injured at work.
To facilitate all the various types of disclosures, covered entities must ensure the request is valid and documented appropriately. This may involve retaining copies, detailing the information disclosed, and maintaining records of the circumstances surrounding the disclosure. Furthermore, healthcare providers must assess whether the disclosure is the least amount of data necessary to achieve the purpose of the request, ensuring compliance with HIPAA’s minimum necessary standard.
Enacted in 2003, the HIPAA Security Rule outlines the necessary safeguards that covered entities must implement to ensure the integrity, accessibility, and confidentiality of PHI that is stored or transmitted electronically, such as, electronic protected health information.8 The primary objective of the rule is to mitigate the risks associated with electronic data, particularly in light of the growing threats of cyberattacks and data breaches. The Security Rule is built on three core safeguards:
- Administrative
- Physical
- Technical
Each category contains specific requirements aimed at creating a comprehensive security framework. Administrative safeguards are policies and procedures intended to select, develop, implement, and maintain security measures. Key elements include:
- Risk analysis
- Covered entities must ensure a thorough risk assessment to detect potential vulnerabilities and threats to ePHI.
- Security management process
- Organizations must implement policies to mitigate identified risks.
- Workforce training
- Employees must be trained in security procedures, ensuring they understand their roles in protecting patient information.
- Incident response plan
- Organizations need to institute protocols for responding to security breaches, including reporting incidents and mitigating harm.
Physical safeguards protect the infrastructure where ePHI is stored and processed. Important measures include:
- Facility access controls
- Covered entities must limit access to physical locations where ePHI is stored using security mechanisms.
- Workstation security
- Policies should be in place to ensure that workstations are secure and that ePHI is not accessible to unauthorized individuals.
- Device and media controls
- There should be protocols for the disposal and reuse of electronic devices and media containing ePHI to prevent unauthorized access. Technical safeguards involve technology solutions that protect ePHI during storage and transmission. Key components include: Access controlCovered entities must implement technical measures to restrict access to ePHI to authorized users only. This includes unique user IDs, emergency access procedures, and automatic logoff systems. Data encryption Encrypting ePHI ensures that even if data is intercepted or accessed unlawfully, it cannot be easily read or misused. Audit controlsEntities that manage protected information must implement mechanisms to record and examine access and activity related to ePHI, ensuring compliance and accountability.
Protecting patient information in healthcare settings is a critical responsibility that involves implementing a series of best practices, utilizing technology and data security measures, and having effective incident response plans in place.9 These efforts start with staff training. Healthcare providers should prioritize regular training workshops and seminars for all staff members to ensure they are aware of HIPAA regulations. Employers must clearly understand the importance of patient privacy and know how to manage PHI securely. The training should cover a range of PHI-related topics, including recognizing phishing attempts and comprehending procedures for reporting security incidents. By adopting a culture of awareness, healthcare organizations can significantly reduce the risk of accidental disclosures or breaches. In addition to training, secure communication methods must be established for transmitting electronic correspondence such as emails with PHI. Secure messaging systems and patient portals with strong authentication protocols can also be used to enhance the security of communications. To set up physical safeguards, covered entities can implement keycard entry systems or biometric scanning while monitoring sensitive areas through surveillance cameras. Technology plays a central role in enhancing data security measures.9 Covered entities need to have robust cybersecurity protocols that include firewalls, anti-virus software, and encryption. They must also update their systems regularly to protect against emerging cyber threats. To further ensure regulatory adherence, covered entities must have an incident response plan in place in case of a breach, so it is addressed promptly and efficiently. An effective plan outlines the specific steps to take if there is a security incident, such as identifying the breach, containing the threat, and notifying affected individuals as well as appropriate authorities, as required by law. Conducting regular drills can help covered entities evaluate the efficiency of their incident response plans. It will also help check if staff members are well-prepared to react swiftly and appropriately to any security breaches.
Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP)
The Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP) is an essential document that informs patients of their rights concerning their PHI, detailing how healthcare providers may use and disclose information.10 Required by HIPAA’s Privacy Rule, the NPP promotes transparency in the patient-provider relationship by clearly outlining the organization’s privacy practices and legal obligations. However, certain covered entities, such as healthcare clearinghouses that handle PHI solely as business associates, correctional institutions, and group health plans without direct access to personal health data, are not required to develop an NPP. An effective NPP must meet specific requirements, including:
- A description of how the provider may use and disclose PHI.
- A clear explanation of the individual’s rights related to their health information and the processes for exercising these rights, including how to file complaints.
- Information on the healthcare provider’s obligations to protect privacy and contact details for further inquiries.
The NPP must be written in understandable, plain language and include an effective date. Healthcare organizations are also required to promptly revise and redistribute their NPP whenever they make material changes to their privacy practices. The Privacy Rule mandates that the NPP be accessible to anyone who requests it and that it be prominently displayed on any website maintained by the covered entity. Healthcare providers must make the NPP available to individuals no later than the first service delivery date, except in emergencies. Providers must make a good faith attempt to obtain the patient’s written acknowledgment of receipt, documenting efforts if acknowledgment cannot be obtained. For web-based or email interactions, the provider must send an electronic version and attempt to receive confirmation from the patient. For ongoing relationships, the NPP must be prominently displayed at the provider’s office or facility and made available in waiting areas and patient portals. Health plans, in particular, must provide the NPP to current enrollees and notify them of any revisions, ensuring that updated notices are distributed every three years or sooner if there are material changes. Patients have the right to review and understand the NPP fully, request clarification, and place certain restrictions on the use and disclosure of their PHI, though providers are not always obligated to agree to these restrictions. Importantly, patients can access, review, and request amendments to their medical records as outlined in the NPP. Healthcare organizations with complex structures, such as those that are part of an organized healthcare arrangement, may develop joint NPPs that cover multiple facilities or services.
When an unauthorized disclosure of patient information occurs, it is essential for healthcare organizations to respond swiftly to mitigate potential harm while still ensuring compliance with HIPAA regulations.2 The first step in addressing a breach is to follow established reporting procedures. This typically involves immediately notifying the designated privacy officer or compliance officer within the organization, who will initiate the appropriate response protocol. Prompt reporting is crucial, as it allows for a rapid assessment of the situation and the implementation of necessary containment measures to prevent further unauthorized access. Following the initial report, the organization must conduct internal investigations to determine the scope and cause of the breach. The investigation should involve gathering relevant data, interviewing involved personnel, and reviewing security protocols to identify vulnerabilities that led to the unauthorized disclosure. The findings from this investigation are instrumental in developing a comprehensive understanding of how the breach happened and what procedures can be put in place to prevent similar incidents in the future. In addition to internal investigations, healthcare organizations have specific patient notification requirements under HIPAA. If a breach of unprotected PHI occurs, the organization must notify affected individuals without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after the discovery of the breach. The notification should include details about what information was compromised, the steps being taken to investigate and mitigate the breach, and advice on how patients can protect themselves from potential harm, such as monitoring their accounts for unusual activity. In cases where a breach affects a group of more than 500 individuals, organizations must also notify the media and report the incident to HHS. After addressing the breach and notifying affected patients, cover entities are required to implement corrective actions and policy updates. This may involve revising existing privacy and security policies, enhancing employee training programs, and implementing stronger safeguards. Organizations are advised to conduct a thorough review of their data protection practices and may consider adopting new technologies, such as encryption or access controls, to bolster their defenses against unauthorized disclosures.
Penalties for Sharing Patient Information
Violating HIPAA results in significant penalties for covered entities, as non-compliance can lead to both civil and criminal repercussions.12 However, the severity of these penalties varies based on the nature of non-compliance, extent of the violation, and whether or not the covered entity knew or should have known of the privacy/security failure. Organizations typically face monetary fines, which escalate with the seriousness of the breach, as well as criminal charges in cases of repeated violations, more severe consequences, or willfully disregarded HIPAA requirements. That said, penalties usually do not exceed a calendar year cap, which sets an upper limit for multiple violations of the same requirement. Types of violations and corresponding penalties are categorized into four tiers, with fines ranging from $127 to $64,000 per violation.2 These amounts are updated every few years and are subject to change. The first tier is for unknowing violations, where the covered entity was not aware or could not realistically have known of the breach, resulting in a minimum fine per violation. The second tier involves violations due to reasonable cause, such as. Fines often start from $1,000. The third tier applies to violations due to willful neglect but is corrected within a specified time. These penalties are higher, starting from $10,000. The most severe tier applies to violations due to willful neglect that remains uncorrected, leading to a maximum fine per violation. In extreme cases, covered entities may face criminal charges, leading to imprisonment for individuals responsible for serious violations. Beyond financial penalties, violations can lead to loss of reputation, diminished patient trust, and potential lawsuits from affected individuals. Civil lawsuits can arise when patients believe their rights have been violated, leading to further financial liability for the organization. Persistent non-compliance with HIPAA can result in heightened scrutiny from regulatory bodies, possibly leading to increased audits and oversight. Healthcare organizations that fail to observe HIPPA regulations risk facing not only financial repercussions but also a lasting impact on their credibility.The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for handling complaints and violations.13 When a complaint is filed, the OCR will conduct an exhaustive investigation to assess the validity of the allegations. Depending on the findings, they may initiate corrective action plans or impose financial penalties. The OCR also has the authority to impose fines on healthcare providers and organizations that fail to comply with HIPAA standards during investigations, serving as a deterrent against future violations. Since 2003, the OCR received 371,572 complaints related to HIPAA violations and initiated over 100,100 compliance reviews. Out of these, approximately 22,000 cases led to enforcement actions, including measures such as settlements, fines, and corrective plans. Some notable HIPAA breaches include a 2011 incident involving Tricare Management of Virginia, which exposed the personal information of 4.9 million individuals in the largest data breach recorded under HIPAA.14 In terms of high fines, Memorial Healthcare Systems was fined $5.5 million in 2017 for unauthorized access to the health records of 115,143 patients.15 In 2011, HIPAA’s first criminal indictment targeted a Virginia physician who shared patient information with the individual’s employer under the false pretense that the patient posed a public safety threat.16 In 2010, Cignet Health of Maryland received a $4.3 million fine for denying patients access to their own records and repeatedly ignoring inquiries from federal authorities.17 According to research, it is estimated that over 173 million people have been affected by HIPAA breaches since October 2009.18
In Texas, there are supplementary regulations that work alongside the federal framework established by HIPAA. Texas state laws are designed to strengthen the protection of patient information, requiring healthcare providers to comply not only with HIPAA standards but also with state mandates that enforce more stringent requirements. One of the primary state laws governing healthcare privacy is the Texas Medical Records Privacy Act (TMRPA).19 Introduced in 2001, the TMRPA sets key provisions and requirements that healthcare providers must follow to ensure the confidentiality of medical records. This includes:
- Obtaining written consent from patients before disclosing their medical records, except in specific circumstances permitted by law
- Implementing appropriate safeguards to protect medical records, whether they are in electronic or paper form
- Allowing patients to access their medical records and receive copies within a specified time.
- Penalties for unauthorized disclosures of medical records, which can include civil penalties and enforcement actions by the Texas Attorney General.
Another critical piece of legislation is the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, which has significant implications for patient information.20 The act aims to protect individuals from identity theft and outlines the responsibilities of businesses, including healthcare providers when managing personal information. Under this act, healthcare organizations must implement security measures to protect sensitive patient data and notify those concerned in the event of a data breach. The act also emphasizes the importance of safeguarding any data that could be used to impersonate an individual, including social security numbers, financial account information, and other identifiers. Failure to fulfill these obligations can result in substantial fines and legal repercussions, reinforcing the need for covered entities to prioritize data security and develop comprehensive policies to protect patient information. When it comes to federal and state benefit requirements for Medicaid and other programs, healthcare providers must navigate a complex landscape of compliance considerations in the state. Medicaid programs in Texas, for instance, have specific eligibility criteria and documentation requirements that healthcare providers must adhere to when billing for services. Providers must also ensure that they are following both HIPAA and state regulations when handling Medicaid recipients’ sensitive information. This includes obtaining proper consent for sharing medical records and ensuring that any disclosures align with both federal and state privacy laws. Compliance with these regulations is critical for maintaining eligibility to participate in Medicaid programs, as violations can result in disqualification from receiving federal and state funding.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a foundational step in the ongoing effort to safeguard patient data. HIPAA’s Privacy Rule and Security Rule delineate comprehensive protocols for managing PHI, ensuring that healthcare providers, plans, and clearinghouses operate within strict compliance standards. While there are circumstances where PHI may be disclosed without explicit patient consent, such as for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations, it is crucial for providers to adhere to the minimum necessary standard to safeguard patient privacy. Understanding the circumstances under which PHI may be disclosed is key, in addition to ensuring appropriate consent mechanisms are in place. This allows providers to balance the importance of patient privacy with the operational needs inherent in healthcare delivery. As the healthcare landscape continues to shift, organizations must remain vigilant and adaptable in the face of emerging threats and regulatory changes. By prioritizing comprehensive staff training, secure communication practices, and robust technology solutions, healthcare providers can effectively navigate compliance requirements and enhance the protection of patient information. In doing so, they reinforce the essential trust that underpins the provider-patient relationship, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of health services and the overall quality of care.
- US Department of Health & Human Services. (2019). Health Information Privacy. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/index.html
- US Department of Health and Human Services. (2022). Summary of the HIPAA privacy rule. HHS.gov; US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html
- US Department of Health & Human Services. (2022). The HIPAA Privacy Rule. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html
- CDC. (2024, September 10). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Public Health Law. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/resources/health-insurance-portability-and-accountability-act-of-1996-hipaa.html
- CDC. (2024, September 10). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Public Health Law. https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/resources/health-insurance-portability-and-accountability-act-of-1996-hipaa.html
- HealthIT.gov. (2019). Guide to Privacy & Security of Electronic Health Information | HealthIT.gov. Healthit.gov. https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-resources/guide-privacy-security-electronic-health-information
- Nass, S. J., Levit, L. A., Gostin, L. O., & US), M. (2015). HIPAA, the Privacy Rule, and Its Application to Health Research. Nih.gov; National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9573
- Office for Civil Rights. (2022, October 19). Summary of the HIPAA security rule. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/security/laws-regulations/index.html
- McGraw, D., & Mandl, K. D. (2021). Privacy protections to encourage use of health-relevant digital data in a learning health system. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00362-8
- Rights (OCR), O. for C. (2008, November 19). Notice of Privacy Practices. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-individuals/notice-privacy-practices/index.html
- Rights (OCR), O. for C. (2009, January 7). Notice of Privacy Practices for Protected Health Information. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/privacy-practices-for-protected-health-information/index.html
- American Medical Association. (2023). HIPAA violations & enforcement. American Medical Association. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/hipaa/hipaa-violations-enforcement
- Office for Civil Rights (OCR). (2008, November 12). How OCR Enforces the HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/examples/how-ocr-enforces-the-hipaa-privacy-and-security-rules/index.html
- Merrill, M. (2011, September 29). TRICARE breach puts 4.9M military clinic, hospital patients at risk. Healthcare IT News. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/tricare-breach-puts-49m-milatry-clinic-hospital-patients-risk
- Rights (OCR), O. for C. (2017, February 14). $5.5 million HIPAA settlement shines light on the importance of audit controls. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/agreements/memorial/index.html
- Virginia Doctor Indicted on HIPAA Charge for Talking to Patient’s Employer | Casetext. (2024). Casetext.com. https://casetext.com/analysis/virginia-doctor-indicted-on-hipaa-charge-for-talking-to-patients-employer
- Rights (OCR), O. for C. (2011, February 22). Civil Money Penalty. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/examples/cignet-health/index.html
- KOCZKODAJ, W. W., MASIAK, J., MAZUREK, M., Dominik STRZAŁKA, & ZABRODSKII, P. F. (2019). Massive Health Record Breaches Evidenced by the Office for Civil Rights Data. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 48(2), 278. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6556182
- HIPAA & Privacy Laws. (n.d.). Texas Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.texas.gov/regulations/legal-information/hipaa-privacy-laws
- Identity Theft Enforcement And Protection Act | Office of the Attorney General. (n.d.). Www.texasattorneygeneral.gov. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/consumer-protection/file-consumer-complaint/consumer-privacy-rights/identity-theft-enforcement-and-protection-act
To access Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.
To access Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), purchase this course or a Full Access Pass.
If you already have an account, please sign in here.